It's politics that moves what can't be forked.

politics is to move what can't be forked.

Paraphrasing: folk No need to play politics with what you can

So what do we do about it?

Case: g0v.

Forking, social innovation, and if it works well, it will be legitimized after the fact by people deciding that it is a good thing.

subjectivism

In case of disagreement, split into two forks

All forks are allowed to exist and it is up to the surrounding community to decide which forks they are interested in

/tkgshn/politics to move what can't be forked.

from /tkgshn/ If everything can be redone, why do we need governance?".

Decidim] is a tool for digital democracy, to support the consensus building process with technology.

I think this project is a thing that [can be forked without needing someone's consent.

Paradoxically, [it's politics that moves what can't be forked.

I guess it's "politics" in the sense that you can't just fork and create as criticism and try to change things without moving your hands.

uppolitical game or something sterile, this will be the case.

from /tkgshn/gov4git

If we think about it not in terms of this project, but in terms of a larger theme (especially in the case of software)「forkableである」というガバナンスが常にメタレイヤーで働いているのではないか/tkgshn/tkgshn.icon

["If it's politics to run something that can't be forked], then voting in software development doesn't make much sense/tkgshn/tkgshn.icon*3.

decide how to make a decision

Consensus

sabotage manual

---

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/forkできないものを動かすのが政治 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.